Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2000MHz vs 1590MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +7%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2020
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy