Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2000MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 +35%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2013
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
863 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK110B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK110-300-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy