Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2000MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +68%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GM206
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy