Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +7776%
3.072 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
18W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy