Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +903%
3.072 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2012
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy