Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +86%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2014
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Vesuvius
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy