Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 80.26GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A350M
+148%
1.766 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
0.711 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2013
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1254 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.408 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.63 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
711.2 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
29.63 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N14P-GT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
