Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1200MHz vs 1150MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +39%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy