Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (2115MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380M
4.096 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +217%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1550 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
128
Tensor Cores
96
8
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy