Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A730M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Intel Arc A730M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc A730M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1455MHz vs 1100MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A730M
6.758 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +32%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
3072
Shading Units
3072
192
TMUs
96
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
24
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
6.758 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy