Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2400MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +36%
17.2 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
3584
Shading Units
4480
224
TMUs
280
112
ROPs
128
448
Tensor Cores
280
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA100
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy