Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
RV380
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy