Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W8100

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +307%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
160
112
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
220W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy