Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +2329%
17.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Dec 2008
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
112
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy