Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FirePro S7150

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770 +421%
19.66 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2016
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Tonga
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy