Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770 +8522%
19.66 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2007
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
20
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
143W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy