Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VS

Intel Arc A770 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages

Released 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2400MHz vs 1740MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

2048 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages

Lower TDP (90W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A770 +175%

19.66 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

7.127 TFLOPS

Blender

Arc A770 +13%

2085

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

1841

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A770 +50%

45

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A770 +33%

80

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

60

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A770 +23%

105

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

85

Arc A770

VS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Jan 2022

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz

Base Clock

1545 MHz

2400 MHz

Boost Clock

1740 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

16

-

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

2048

256

TMUs

64

128

ROPs

32

512

Tensor Cores

64

32

RT Cores

16

-

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

16 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.68 GPixel/s

614.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

111.4 GTexel/s

39.32 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

7.127 TFLOPS

19.66 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.127 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

111.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

GA107

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

GA107-140-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

6 nm

Process Size

8 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

8.7 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

225W

TDP

90W

550 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

3

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

4

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

5

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

6

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

8

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

9

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

10

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD