Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs Intel GMA X4500

Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs Intel GMA X4500

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
944 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile +5321%
4.608 TFLOPS
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
FSB

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
10
32
ROPs
1
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

72.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
533.0 MPixel/s
144.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.330 GTexel/s
9.216 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.608 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
85.28 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Eaglelake
-
GPU Variant
-
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Generation 5.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

28W
TDP
13W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy