Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2000MHz vs 1605MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +100%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
8
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy