Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +37%
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2015
Alchemist
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Amethyst
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy