Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1700MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +2%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy