Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FirePro V7900

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +87%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cayman
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy