Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FirePro V8800

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +31%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1600
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy