Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro W8100

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +21%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy