Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +50%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy