Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 58W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +2318%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
58W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G94
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy