Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and a Professional market GPU: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1700MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +129%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
1024
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
8
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GA106
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy