Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +1689%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF108
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy