Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +686%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM
0.612 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2012
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.376 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.50 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
612.1 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK107-320-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy