Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +673%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
236W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy