Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 201% (2350MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +703%
4.813 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2015
Alchemist
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Oland
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy