Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50
4.813 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +70%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Alchemist
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Fiji
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy