Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD FirePro W9100

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (130W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60 +60%
8.397 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy