Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (2130MHz vs 2050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60
8.397 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +42%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Feb 2024
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
256
Tensor Cores
88
16
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy