Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1300MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +636%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.528 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.11 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
GK208
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.02 billion
Unknown
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy