Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1300MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +933%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Nov 2017
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
978 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
GM108S
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.02 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy