Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1532MHz vs 1300MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +352%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
May 2017
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
GP108
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy