Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +38037%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.680 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.44 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

350W
TDP
38W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy