Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +579%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
1152
192
TMUs
96
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
100W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy