Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +52566%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 150M
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Xe Graphics
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.120 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.120 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
10W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy