Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +38037%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Oct 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
21W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy