Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
Lower TDP (110W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +1%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
10.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
6144
Shading Units
3072
192
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
110W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy