Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +233%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
6144
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
40W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy