CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 1T
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1358MHz
Lower TDP (95W vs 350W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
+59%
11.06 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
6.953 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
VS
RTX A2000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
12 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Board Design
350W
TDP
95W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
2
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
3
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
4
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
5
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
6
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
8
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Tesla C870
9
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
10
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy