Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +421%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
55W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy