Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+38%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2020
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
7680
Shading Units
3584
240
TMUs
224
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
