Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +7%
13.82 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
7680
Shading Units
4608
240
TMUs
288
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
260W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy