Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +23323%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
42W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy