Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.5GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1733MHz
Lower TDP (180W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +55%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
8.873 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Oct 2016
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
160
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
180W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy