CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA L40
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA L40
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA L40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 48GB VRAM L40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 864.0GB/s)
NVIDIA L40 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2490MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
10496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
L40
+554%
90.52 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
L40
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2490 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
142
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
18176
240
TMUs
568
120
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
478.1 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
90.52 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
90.52 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-895-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
4 nm
8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
6
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
7
NVIDIA L40 vs NVIDIA L40S
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy