Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA L40

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA L40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 48GB VRAM L40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 864.0GB/s)
NVIDIA L40 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2490MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
10496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
L40 +554%
90.52 TFLOPS
VS
L40

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2490 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
142
7680
Shading Units
18176
240
TMUs
568
120
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
478.1 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
90.52 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
90.52 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-895-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
4 nm
8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy