Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +2567%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
7680
Shading Units
320
240
TMUs
40
120
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy